(Duplicate)

Brunswick

28. Feb: 1760.

My Lords,

I refer you to my Letter of the 19th. January in which I wrote at large all the Occurrences of the last Sessions, which I send with the several Journals Bills &c since which some Difficulties have arisen about the Charters to some of the Counties and Towns which have formerly sent Members of which I must inform your Lordships and receive Your Opinion open in issuing future Writs upon calling Assemblies; all the Counties which had been appointed by Acts of Assembly and had been repealed by His Majesty in 1754, and had been reinstated again without any Clause to elect Members have taken out or applied for Charters except Tyrrel formerly a 5 Member County, and New Hanover County, the last not having been repealed by his Majesty's Order, and the 2 Towns of Edenton and New Bern, which I find stand upon a Clause of a Bill not then repealed—I must therefore lay their several Claims or Objections to take out Charters before your Lordships that you may be apprized of my Reasons of allowing and disallowing of their several Writs, until they take out Charters or until his Majesty's pleasure is known by new Instructions against future Elections.

As to Tyrrel I find their only Objection is that they are to have for the future only 2 Members in lieu of 5 formerly, which I think by my Instructions I am not impowered to grant, as none of the Counties in his Majesty's District nor any new erected Counties have more than two since I am instructed as near as I can to bring the Northern and Southern Districts to an Equality, and I can't lessen the Numbers elected in the four Northern Counties of Chowan Pequimons Pasquotank and Currituc, which although they are very small Counties send 5 Members each and as I have divided Edgcomb County and made Halifax County out of it which will send 4 Members instead of 2 when undivided, Lord Granville can't complain that 3 Members are taken from the small County of Tyrrel, besides for the Conveniency of Chowan Bertie and Northampton Counties I have erected Hertford County and of these, which will have two Members more in Lieu of one taken from Bertie by Charter which formerly sent three, and the other taken from Tyrrel, so that Lord Granville's District will still have the same Number of Members in Assembly.

New Hanover County stands yet unrepealed by your Lordships not having found out how they are entitled to be a separate District and to send Members. New Hanover I find was appointed by a Bill passed 27. Novr. 1729 Chaptr. 10. under the Title of an Act for regulating Vestries &c. in which nothing appears relative to New Hanover Precinct, this Act is not inserted among the printed Acts only the Title with this Remark in the Margin Repealed by Act April 4th. 1741 except that Clause which erects New Hanover into a District—The Bill which repeals it in 1741 Chapter 23d is entitled an Act for establishing the Church for appointing Parishes and the Method of electing Vestries, which in the 21st. Section repeals that Bills so far as relates to the Church Vestries &c. This irregular Method of not knowing the Contents of the Acts by the Titles prevented your Lordships from repealing that Law, and his Majesty having repealed the last Act in 1741 the former remains in it's full force for these Reasons I can't refuse issuing a Writ for that County for this new Assembly, & if your Lordships think it necessary that they shou'd take out a Charter to support his Majestys Prerogative, I believe you will think it advisable that His Majesty shou'd repeal that Bill, or give me further Instructions upon it.

The Case of Edenton and New Bern's Right of sending Members is founded on a general Clause in an Act of the Proprietors the 19. January 1715 entitled an Act for appointing a Town in the County of Bath Chap: 52. Sections 33d, 34, & 35, by Virtue of which Bath sends a Member, and also Edenton and New Bern upon the general Clause of every Town in the Province being allow'd to send Members when they shall have 60 families resident in them. These Clauses I believe were overlooked when his Majesty thought he had repealed the Edenton Law, by repealing the Act of the 1st. of Augt. 1740 which confirm'd their Power of sending a Member—and therefore Edenton Bath Town and New Bern are still impowered by Law to send Members, and am therefore obliged to issue Writs to these Towns at this Time; and hope that in these Instances I have pursued my Instructions as far as I can do by Law; But Your Lordships will consider whether it mayn't be advisable to repeal the Bath Town Law, as all future Towns when they have 60 families will send Members without having Charters from the Crown and so lessen his Majesty's Prerogative.

As there are several displeased with me for steadily adhering to my Instructions, and seem desirous to make a Breach in the Province by setting up of Northern and Southern Interests especially the Treasurers, who are not pleased at my sending over Copies of their irregular Accounts, and some others at their head, who hope to gain in Case I shou'd be guilty of any mistakes, and I am told have as much as they cou'd delayed and prevented the Counties from taking out Charters saying it is unconstitutional, and only a Scheme of mine to get fees contrary to Law, lest I may err and they shou'd make any Clamour against me which might reach Your Lordships, I must state that point to you, and have your Orders or Instructions upon it.

Upon the Repeal and reenacting of the Counties without a Power of sending Members but by taking out of Charters, the County of Orange and Town of Brunswick applied by Petition for Charters, as there was no fee mentioned in the fee Bill for taking out of Charters under the great Seal. I advised with the then Attorney General Mr. Robert Jones and asked him what I shou'd take as a fee for each Charter; I said I thought I cou'd not take less than £5; he said he thought it was too little for such a Priviledge for ever and thought 10w. Proc: was little enough, which according To the Discount is 5 Guineas, a Guinea passing for 40 Shillings, and a pistole for 30 Shillings besides what they might give to the Secretaries, upon which he took out Orange Charter and sent me the fee, as did also Brunswick; I therefore in pursuance of his Advice have continued to take that fee, for as the Assembly give nothing to the Governor but such Perquisites, and neither allowed me for House Rent, nor even my Expences in going to Philadelphia to serve the Province and the publick which all other Provinces allow, I thought a fee which does not amount to 1 penny ⅌. Taxable was but a reasonable fee, and might hurt future Governors, which is not more than a Justice of peace in Ireland pays for his Commission; But upon hearing of the Complaint they wou’d make against me, I have deposited the fee, and will not make use of it until I have your Lordship's Approbation or if too much shall return the whole, or what part you shall think proper to instruct me to do, submitting the whole to your Lordships.

I am with due Regard

My Lords

Your Lordships

most obedient and

most humble Servt.

Arthur Dobbs

No. Carolina.
Lre from Arthur Dobbs Esqr., Governor of North Carolina, to the Board, dated Febry 28. 1760, stating the Difficulties he is under with respect to the Towns & Counties that are to send Representatives to the next Genl. Assembly.

Read April 23 1760.

D.60.